My narrow advice would be to make a list of 20 questions you’d like to ask someone. Then reach out to people on LinkedIn you think could give you good answers and ask them if you could pick their brain for 30 minutes. Then ask those questions and say thank you a lot.
We’ve been front page a handful of times with fairly consistent results. Front page (not first) - 100 to 200 points, 10k day of post, falling to hundreds subsequent days.
The one time we were top post it was 30k visits that day. Thousands the next. Then hundreds the following. Almost 500 points.
It’s a great feeling when it happens. Community comments are super insightful and thought provoking as well.
In my (admittedly limited) experience, Very Successful People say versions of "that will be really hard" very often, and say "that is impossible / won't work" effectively never.
I'm not sure if this is causation or correlation, or even which direction a possible causative link would flow in (eg being positive + open-minded makes you more successful vs. being successful makes you more positive + open-minded). But it's absolutely a pattern that I've noticed.
IME most people will generally appear to be making things up as they go – even if they have significant relevant experience. Every situation is unique, and experience tends to look more like having a list of techniques with varying degrees of expertise, rather than having a playbook for every situation. You have to look for the expertise rather than raw confidence.
In sports terms it would be something like a baseball pitcher being able to throw a great curveball, a great fastball, and an all right slider, and knowing roughly what situations to use them in. There will still be a high degree of randomness and mistakes will be made.
Agreed. What experience and talent gives you are instincts that improve the chances of whatever it is "you're making up as you go" working well.
I would much rather work with people who have a good track record of making it up as they go as opposed to people coming in with a fixed idea of how something should happen and are more likely to misapply whatever lessons led to those views (probably someone elses anyway).
I really agree with this advice, with the added thought that very very specific struggles are usually easier to write about and more compelling to read. For example, this post that my co-author wrote was well-received, I think in part because the advice is so specific ("Don't joke about firing people" as opposed to something like "be a more empathetic manager"). https://staysaasy.com/engineering/2020/06/09/Don't-Joke.html
I also find these types of posts more compelling when the struggle or the solution is non-obvious.
IME if it's inconvenient to write, you'll never do it. My blog co-author and I do our drafting and editing in Google Docs for that reason. Once you're done writing, you're sufficiently emotionally invested that you can handle the hassle of porting the content to a public site.
We also only add images to posts if it's absolutely necessary. We probably get less engagement than we would if we had high-quality imagery, but we have wayy more engagement than if we didn't write at all.
It also has some mild advantages in terms of auto-generating links to their homepage when referring to the company by name in places like Teams or Slack.
Yup and as recently as 24 months ago, $3B would still have been somewhat pricey at their revenue and growth rate. It'd be very hard for me personally to justify investing in a product that is in such a competitive market without product moats. It seems like with an absence of product differentiation Monday.com is aiming to differentiate via marketing, which is a very expensive way to grow.
My narrow advice would be to make a list of 20 questions you’d like to ask someone. Then reach out to people on LinkedIn you think could give you good answers and ask them if you could pick their brain for 30 minutes. Then ask those questions and say thank you a lot.