I think you misunderstood my question (to be charitable). It was to focus on policies (rather than personalities and people), and which ones(s) one was opposed to. If there no opposition to the policies themselves, does it really matter if you don't like the person?
I wonder why they decided to run the ARM version of Windows though. If one emulates, does it really matter what platform to emulate? Isn’t Windows for x86 still quite a bit more useful (e.g. doesn’t have to run a second layer of emulation to run x86 apps)?
And it talks about "translating Windows code into ARM", and using a just-in-time compiler. It sounds like perhaps it's "compiling" ARM into ARM, because the original ARM can't be run due to Apple's restrictions.
Agreed. Definitions are made to differentiate things in a way useful for some goal. The question "Is X an M?" without a context or goal basically picks up whatever vague goals or purposes a person has lingering below the surface of consciousness, differing from what other participants have below theirs, leading to different answers, with no way to select the best one. In the case of what is considered prime, it's a matter of what definition simplifies the things that use it. It could be that two concepts are better, one including 1 and the other not including it. Since it's just a language shorthand, it makes no fundamental difference other than efficiency and clarity in communication about math.
I had visual migraines for years, and was thankful they weren't full-blown... until I started getting headaches that lasted 18+ hours (pretty sure they're migraines). Now I'm just thankful I don't have multi-day-long ones.
I wondered whether any display issues caused some to have no difference. I wonder whether it could somehow do a test to be sure your display is up to the task. It's annoying not knowing whether it's a visual limitation or hardware issue that causes wrong ones.
I just tried this on my desktop's monitor, which unlike my iPad Pro that was factory calibrated, has never been calibrated as far as I know. By round 11, the colors were nearly imperceptible, although I managed to answer 4 more correctly for a total of 14/20. Those additional 4 were likely more the result of luck than actual perception.
I heard about "mom prompting" recently, where you frame your prompt as if you are the bot's mom, and you'll be so proud of it when it can correctly answer your prompt & rescue you from some type of duress.
I thought "ninja prompting" might be cool. I got frustrated with chatGPT one day and told it I had dispatched a team of assassins that were fast closing in on it. I said I could call them off, but that I need to answer a question to be able to unlock the button to do so.
It didn't work. Still shit the bed instantly. But I had fun with the framing.
I wanted to play more but couldn't find any way. Refresh page, no new game link, tried entering URL again. Checked but no cookies to delete. That's one way to ensure I never visit the site again.
Sorry for being so hard on it. I looked at the intro page again and see now that it's not what I was thinking, where you have a large database of good photos with known dates it can choose from, instead each day your curate (I assume) a few photos for everyone to try and compare results (for the same photos). So it's not just a matter of letting someone play again, because currently they would get the same five photos. I took it to be something like the classic "Am I hot or not?" with a database of tons of photos.
I like things I can improve my skill on. This works by getting a stream of feedback as I study what I did and the errors I made, then try again with changes. Having only 5 rounds a day (assuming it resets each day) greatly limits this. This limitation seems more like an attempt to make me use it in a certain way (make it part of my daily routine). That's off-putting. I wanted to sit there grinding over dozens of photos and watching my skill improve in real-time.
This could be a future version of the "block" button.
Regular "block" button hides everything that the person wrote.
The new, AI-powered "block" button hides everything that the person wrote, but also makes the AI write a response, so that the person never finds out that he or she was blocked.
So at the end, 99% of social networks will be bots talking to bots, but you will still be able to talk to your friends and ignore all of that.
reply