It would be fair to say this applies to ai generated code. And seeing how places like google claim over 40% of their code is ai generated it would be fair to say they don't own the code.
LLMs are built on top of mass theft and get away with it due to it being "derivative work". I find it strange that stealing her voice was the "this has gone too far" moment and not when they started mass scraping the internet.
CHIP-8 was what caused me to stop using github and host my projects privately. I had no license set and had everything marked as copyright and it still ended up on being ported to the Nintendo Switch without my permission. I deleted the repo thinking that would be the end of it but it gets worse. When I type my uniquely spelled name with co-pilot enabled it starts auto completing my full name and code. :(
I remember gamedevs wanting a company like this to test video game drivers and shader code on a slew of different cards and vendors but this seems clearly set up for LLM work.
Are these people even sure the comment is even deleted on the backend where I assume the data will be taken from? I feel like they'll be pissing upwind and en-shit-ifying the site that will only harm users and not the data harvesting. If anything you want the public facing stuff there and free to scrape by any average Joe.
I don't know if I would call a math library that uses templates so liberally "high performance". High performance also includes compile time in my opinion.
I get the template hate, they take a while to wrap your head around and can create cryptic bugs. Nonetheless they can be extremely powerful and enable performance and reduced complexity by being a bit complex upfront.
