You've made this claim before. It's so extraordinary that either we all would have learned it in school or Nature would have published it and in addition it would have been in all the major media.

Claiming that blacks are a different species, not even a different race, is some next level Hitler / KKK / etc. shit.

But basically, I just think you don't know what you're talking about. For example, I just typed "species" into my search box and Google handily provided the following from Wikipedia:

> A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which two individuals are capable of reproducing fertile offspring, typically using sexual reproduction.

Go try and fix Wikipedia if you wish to spread nonsense.

> Claiming that blacks are a different species, not even a different race, is some next level Hitler / KKK / etc. shit.

I may be missing something, but the claim I've read around the Internet is that "Africans" are the only pure Human group, and are a different species from Neanderthals, while other Human groups have a small percentage of Neanderthal genes.

Whether that's true or not, it seems like a far less problematic claim than the one you mention.

I think you missed the “often" in your quote from wiki.

This study is telling us that Africans and Neanderthals are not able to produce fertile male offspring when a male Neanderthal reproduces with a African female. This is a common occurrence when two different species breed.

I do agree that it is extraordinary that the meaning of this discovery is not recognised more widely, but please do not place words in my mouth as to what this means.