The author tried this treatment on herself. I was unable to find data associated with this self-experiment, such as lactate measurements on multiple days while applying the treatment. Is there another article I missed that covered this?
FogBugz just sent out a retraction. Their intention was to retire the free service and offer the opportunity to upgrade to paid accounts at a 50% discount. If anyone was charged and didn't already receive a refund, the email to request a refund is fogbugzbilling@ignitetech.com.
Here's the beginning of their retraction email, in which they explain how this happened.
===
Dear FogBugz User,
Mea culpa — sincerely.
We’ve become well aware of the maelstrom of concern and comments caused by a series of emails that some of you received, but to explain, we were just as surprised as you when multiple emails were sent. Our original and only intended email, which was controlled by humans, was to inform you that the “free,” non-expiring version of FogBugz is being phased out on October 17, 2022. Additionally, we wanted to offer you the option to continue using FogBugz by updating your account to a paid subscription. This was the entire, planned effort.
However, once we updated the accounts that had been identified as free and non-expiring in the internal FogBugz accounting system, the software automatically generated a form email, notifying you that we had summarily converted you to a paid account, and worse, actually triggering collection/dunning notices to some. This was unintended and is not accurate. Yes, we’ve owned the software for some time and should know all of the nooks and crannies by now. We don’t know if this was a nook or a cranny, but it decided to act on its own. Truth. It’s embarrassing, and we’d react the same way as many of you have. So this email is to set the record straight.
We do not automatically charge any customer for usage of the software unless a subscription has been expressly elected, despite what the erroneous auto-email stated.
United Healthcare | Lisp/Clojure Software Engineer | REMOTE | Full-time
We're a small, sharp team within one of the world's largest companies.
As a Lisp/Clojure Software Engineer, you will design, create, and maintain software that interfaces with clearinghouses, Medicaid agencies, and plan sponsors. As part of a small team, using technologies such as Clojure, Lisp, and MarkLogic, you will be responsible for the accuracy of our most critical data and solve difficult engineering problems in a distributed system with terabytes of data while ensuring performance and scalability. This is a very data-focused software engineering role - heavy emphasis on data integrity and performance, not user interfaces.
Apply via the following link and tell the screener that Eric sent you via HN. Code sample (any language) or Github link is appreciated but not required.
United Healthcare | Lisp/Clojure Software Engineer | REMOTE | Full-time
We're a small, sharp team within one of the world's largest companies.
As a Lisp/Clojure Software Engineer, you will design, create, and maintain software that interfaces with clearinghouses, Medicaid agencies, and plan sponsors. As part of a small team, using technologies such as Clojure, Lisp, and MarkLogic, you will be responsible for the accuracy of our most critical data and solve difficult engineering problems in a distributed system with terabytes of data while ensuring performance and scalability. This is a very data-focused software engineering role - heavy emphasis on data integrity and performance, not user interfaces.
Apply via the following link and tell the screener that Eric sent you via HN. Code sample (any language) or Github link is appreciated but not required.
With some assistance and teaching, cats and dogs are capable of learning to speak in sentences. In 2018, a speech pathologist named Christina Hunger, who used AAC devices to help special needs children learn to talk, tried applying a similar approach to her dog, Stella. It worked surprisingly well. Stella could speak in four-word sentences with a vocabulary of around 15 words by her first birthday, and was up to 49 words by her third birthday. Since then, many other people have followed the same process to teach their pets how to talk.
Top suspects are both viruses: Sars-Cov-2 (COVID-19) and adenovirus 41. But the real cause could just as easily be something else that hadn’t been detected yet. It’s just too early to be certain.
I don’t see why sar-cov-2 would be suspect given it has been running around for a good 2 years already. Unless there is a suspected lower base rate and the sheer speed at which BA.1/2 rips through the population.
1) Many of these hepatitis patients tested positive for Sars-Cov-2 when they arrived at the hospital for hepatitis.
2) Sars-Cov-2 is changing fast. Just in the last few months it has changed substantially several times. Increased hepatitis risk in kids might be one of those changes.
3) The usual causes of hepatitis were not present, and no better explanation has been found yet.
Investigation still in progress. Might be one of these two viruses. Might be something else that hasn’t been detected yet.
Bacteria occasionally intermingle and swap DNA. Most such mutations are not viable, but occasionally you end up with the odd survivor.
This gets more interesting with viruses in the mix. When two viruses infect the same host that later gene transfers items genes the viral payload can end up joining.
It’s a weird, fascinating, and somewhat horrifying (conceptually) process.
The most damaging hurricanes rely heavily on warm water over their last 2-3 days before landfall. Suppose we focused these bright cloud emitters on the water in front of a tropical storm, as a way to prevent it from strengthening into a hurricane?
Imagine the city of Miami deciding that eliminating local hurricanes would benefit its local real estate market. They invest in a fleet of hurricane blockers to be deployed off their coast during hurricane season to reduce the odds of getting hit by any hurricane, and almost guarantee no more cat 5 hurricanes. This project is worth it for Miami because it has a dramatic effect on home values and insurance costs... And the world also benefits from the cooling that Miami's hurricane shield produces.
Thank you for this, it connects the dots between the economic value of carbon capture and its price. If it's worth it for a second tier city to spend $X billion on heat mitigation, then it's worth the similar amount to reduce the cause by the corresponding magnitude. There's some net-present-value math to be done, but that's for the CFOs.
I think you're overestimating Miami's budget... sure, there are a lot of wealthy people living there, but that doesn't mean the city itself is that wealthy.
BTW, if sea levels rise, property values in Miami are liable to go down the drain anyway, hurricanes or no hurricanes...
Probably not within the municipal budget of Miami, but Florida has a lot of clout in National Politics dues to the electoral college. Florida is the second largest net recipient of Federal tax dollars (after VA (proximity to DC)). If the cost of hurricane mitigation is less than the cost damages to coastal real estate in Florida then it would still be a good move on balance.
This assumes the demand for property stays the same. Is it likely, once it becomes obvious there's a chance your property will be destroyed by rising sea levels?
I used to think that obviously coastal real estate would plummet in value after a few high profile losses. After this pandemic I no longer think it will happen except very, very slowly. But the beaches will be gone for perhaps centuries, the sand will wash away / get covered in water. Sand does not form in a day. I have seen this in areas of Greece where there were earthquakes decades ago. Not even a hint of a beach remains.
I don't know GP is measuring, but indeed the value at risk in NYC is higher than Miami. But the way they wrote it, they weren't saying that, and there are more properties at risk in Miami.
Very disappointing that the top comment on this article is COVID misinformation. The forcry account was created 3 weeks ago and specializes in COVID misinformation.
No, CDC isn’t messing with the tests like this. And all this fancy talk about CT values is just cover for a false statement about CDC policy.
Imagine the CDC yelling: "Don't throw that away! I need more details! Please! If you won't finish the job, please let me do that work!"
That's my translation of the document I found when looking into this issue. More details below...
===
"CDC is suggesting CT value of 28 for detecting breakthrough infections after vaccinations... So that means, a breakthrough infection needs to have 128 times viral load in someone who has been vaccinated to be considered as positive, than it is required to have considered as positive in a non-vaccinated person."
This sounded strange to me, so I searched for more information about it. It looks like you just misunderstood the CDC's policy.
This document regarding breakthrough case investigations was the second result in a Google search for "cdc ct value 28". The relevant text can be found on page 5 of that document.
"If SARS-CoV-2 sequencing will not be performed locally and a specimen is available, the state public health laboratory should request the residual clinical respiratory specimen for subsequent shipping to CDC. For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value <=28 to CDC for sequencing."
In other words... Imagine some lab just found a breakthrough case. And this breakthrough case had an especially high viral load (Ct 28). And the lab was just going to report a positive and throw away the sample...
Imagine the CDC yelling: "Don't throw that away! I need more details! Please! If you won't finish the job, please let me do that work!"
That's what the document is saying. There's a rare event that needs extra analysis. CDC is just letting the labs know in advance that if they ever see this event, and didn't have the resources to fully analyze it, please send that sample to the CDC so it gets the attention it deserves.
Nothing to do with whether the test is considered positive or a breakthrough - just about whether to put extra effort into gathering more details on that particular case. CDC is volunteering to do this extra effort only for higher Ct values. Whether or not they do this extra work, it's still a positive result either way.
I am not sure I like someone vocalising CDCs thought. It is kind of disturbing. I mean, you can be cutting someone throat and saying "be quite my child, it is all for best"..
anyway here is what I have responded to a similar comment
Adaxa Technologies creates software that powers dental insurance plans for over 4 million members across 8 states. We've grown from just 1 state to 8 in the 10 years I've been here and are still growing fast.
As an Lisp/Clojure Software Engineer, you will design, create, and maintain software that interfaces with clearinghouses, Medicaid agencies, and plan sponsors. As part of a small team, using technologies such as Clojure, Lisp, and MarkLogic, you will be responsible for the accuracy of our most critical data and solve difficult engineering problems in a distributed system with terabytes of data while ensuring performance and scalability. This is a very data-focused software engineering role - heavy emphasis on data integrity and performance, not user interfaces.
Apply by sending an email to me (Director of Software Development): elavigne at adaxatech dot com. Include "HN job posting" in the subject and include both your resume and a code sample for us to review. Code sample can be in any language to give us an idea of your programming ability.
B.jpg){kind=link}