Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | enva2712's commentslogin

i’ve run into this issue with pthread_cancel

it makes cleanup logic convoluted when you can’t easily pthread_cleanup_push, forcing you to either block on the join or signal cancellation and detach


rankine cycle lets you cross vapor dome to access latent heat. enables scaleup


[flagged]



i agree with your sentiment, and them botching the license was clearly a problem, but at the same time i think a dev waives their right to be indignant about someone forking and commercializing their code when they provide a perpetual, irrevocable, commercial license to do so. if continue was GPL’d or something i would respect the uproar more


you assume professionalism and technical ability are positively correlated. my anecdotal observations would lean the other way but i have no data to substantiate this on

i do disagree with the methodology of the paper though - adherence to standards is a metric of conformance to a status quo, which as someone else’s comment points out feels like the midwit meme


this is incredibly negative but lacks examples, could you back your statements up with evidence or ease off the hyperbole? the middle ground is the worst


I was in a bad state of mind when I posted. I would delete this if I could.


<3


that’s an interesting excuse as it only happened 3 hours ago


you install the bootloader yourself on arch


this comment is a masterclass in advertising

start relatable: “my experience” add reinforcing detail: works well with fx2 hw add negative experience: bad for analog logic introduce habit trigger: next time use ngscopeclient for analog logic


I'm a bit confused, is the implication that they're shilling for ngscopeclient or something? It's not a paid product (neither is sigrok). They're not wrong either, Pulseview (sigrok) is great doesn't feel very designed for interactive use from the little bit I played with it.


Either way it is great marketing. Maybe they just have a knack for it!


Maybe they just use LLM to proof their comments. You too can sound like dismissible ad copy with this one simple trick!


I didn't use an LLM, but on rereading in the morning, I am cringing at "wasn't so interactive", so maybe I should have. There had to be a better way to put my complaint.


It's fine, we will all be suspected of being LLMs now. :)


fixed function compression on-die would be interesting if applied to this


> Don’t say no to leadership when the timeline is not realistic.

This was listed as an action that undermines trust. You agree with the author


It looks like the phrasing threw me off. I now see that the author meant "Not saying no to leadership ..."



the missile is eepy https://youtu.be/Csp_OABIsBM


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: