Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more bunnycorn's comments login

> Nobody's going to choose Apple over Netflix or Steam or the like on the theory that Netflix/Steam is "scammy."

No.

In the same way people won't be choosing Netflix over HBO because HBO is scammy.

The whole article doesn't make any sense.

When you buy a computer or a phone, you buy just one and that's it, having more than a computer or phone doesn't make much sense as it's worse than having only one. So Apple needs to make a decidedly (for the costumer) better product.

While in art/entertainment, there's no "better", people consume the content they want, and can have more than one subscription.

You can have Netflix and Apple and HBO and many others, or none at all.

The only thing Apple needs is to produce content good enough that people are willing to spend the mensality.


The standard internet is Google's playground.

Having worked in an ISP, only one thing mattered to costumers, and only one thing: YouTube.


Why?

Apple has Apple Music, has more music than Spotify and even if there is a track on Spotify and not in Apple Music, you can upload your own MP3s and stream them. I have a gigantic collection of Soundtracks and indie music there.


If Spotify wasn't on iOS I would move back to Android in an instant. I don't like Apple services because I don't want vendor lock in.

I use Spotify because they're independent and support a large number of devices. This is just like how I use Sonos because they're independent and support a large number of services.

Apple benefits greatly from having high quality, third party applications on iOS. Wasn't the lack of third party apps/support one of the big issues with Windows Phone?


Lots of people said that when a popular local carrier changed from free Spotify to free Apple Music on one of its plans. Everybody switched to Apple Music.

Windows Phone failed primarily because it didn't offer anything that Android or iOS couldn't offer.


Like many people, I use spotify for music discovery. I don’t feel Apple Music can offer the same quality of recommended tracks for me/moods.


To me, Apple Music is vastly superior in that aspect.

Just the fact they have human curatorators that really know what they are doing, is telling.


Open Source, pay for Apple's WebKit and Apple's contributions to FreeBSD and other open source projects.

Every Linux box that is connected to a printer (specially networked printers) runs CUPS in part by Apple.

Also, FreeBSD is a small part of macOS, contrary to what some people want other people to believe, and FreeBSD is not in that camp of GPLv3, so no, FreeBSD is not on that disgusting echo chamber leaded by Stallmann


> Every Linux box that is connected to a printer (specially networked printers) runs CUPS in part by Apple.

CUPS was an independent project before Apple bought it, and we haven't exactly seen major improvements since the sale.


So then Apple should pay KDE for KHTML, for WebKit is just a fork of that?


Taylor Swift is an hypocrite.

She called out Apple when she was at her high, now she bends to Spotify and launches exclusive content on the platform. The platform that doesn't want to pay the artists even when they have all the right.


What did she actually say about Apple?

She mightn't be a hypocrite, just she may not care as long as she's paid??


Ask Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, etc.


Basically an Amazon shopping list for them to make money off comissions.


Meanwhile, I've seen today a video of a new product from a Russian manufacturer (Kalashnikov), of Kamikaze drones.

I applaud Nadella.


Who paid for that "study"?

Qualcomm...

Yeah, no.


"This study has been done entirely independently, and Cellular Insights takes full responsibility for the analysis and opinions in this report. We have self-funded the procurement of iPhone 7 Plus units through commercial retail channels."

????


So... who paid for it?


independently

in·de·pend·ent·ly

/ˌindəˈpendəntlē/

adverb

1. in a way that is free from outside control or influence.

2. without outside help; unaided.


Who paid for it?

We all know ho paid for it, so you can keep repeating whatever you want.


They said they fully did it on their own. I guess you like unsupported conspiracy theories? Is that your thing?

It appears the site is run by Milan Milanović, who works for Ookla. He writes extensively on wired and wireless networks.

https://www.speedtest.net/insights/blog/author/milan/


Sure thing, he bought equipament that costs millions of dollars and did that just so he could post on his site that only opened when Apple started not using Qualcomm modems, right?

It's Qualcomm propaganda, like it or not.


Nothing special, 5% is normal. After the last one, we know they will just hit them with a slap in the wrist.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: