What if you invite them into your home and then 2 years later, you see that they have decorated their house with obvious inspiration from your own home decor?
You have to also factor in the difference in size:
What if you invite them into your home and then 2 years later you see they have decorated their dogs house with obvious inspiration from your own home decor.
If that's what it means, well, seeing the code two years ago is a total non-issue where the setup is so basic and the majority of languages are new ones.
But your interpretation seems way too generous when he compares it to going into your house and stealing from you.
Location: Georgia, USA
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: C#/.NET Core, PHP, Ruby
Résumé/CV: https://brb3.org/resume.html
Email: bobby at brb3 dot org
I'm a Software Engineer with 10+ years of experience (the past 4 100% remote). I have a strong ecommerce and logistics background.
Is the difference that Apple product launches are (not exclusively) intended for consumers whereas the Wall is aimed almost exclusively at large business's lobbies?
... and for luxury living. Luxury car launches are covered on the hn frontpage as well, e.g. that weird car whose windows Elon broke... probably increasing its value in the process.
What's "wrong" about this? No one has provided any evidence of manipulation other than speculation. Maybe people are interested in Samsung's display technology?
I don't know how to provide evidence of manipulation as an outside observer. I was pointing out that it does seem strange. But maybe this is the course of HN nowadays.
Please don't break the site guidelines by insinuating astroturfing or shillage and whatnot. It's nearly always just imagination, and it poisons discussion here.
Turns out, you can't mention that things might be astroturfing on HN because that's against the rules. So _pointing out_ something fishy is against the rules here. That seems very strange to me.
"In comments... Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email us and we'll look at the data. "
It's not that you can't make a post discussing astroturfing on HN or that you can't point out astroturfing to someone that can actually do something about it it's that you aren't supposed to just respond to an article that you think it's astroturfing as that helps nobody even if it is or isn't actually astroturfing.
Whitespace in front of the @ is only allowed within quotes, and any quoted part must be seperated by dots from unqoted parts. "my address"@example.com is allowed, as is my." ".address@example.com, but not my"address"@example.com.
Once you get that into a regex format, remember that a quoted dot is different from an unqoted dot, and don't forget that you handle comments within email addesses correctly.
There are plenty of reasons why people say not to use regex to validate email addresses.
Exactly. It is very much our nature as programmers to attempt to capture this seemingly trivial bit of structured text into seemingly innocuous programming rules, but the rewards of the added complexity are just too meager. Even if an email address validates, it still doesn't mean that you have a working email address. Sending an email is the only way to be sure, and if you are already doing that, then why risk excluding valid email addresses with a decidedly non-trivial regex?
There are regexes out there that capture all the complexity of valid email addresses today (but who knows if they'll work with, say, next year's additions to the top-level domains?), and you can copy them from StackOverflow if you really want them; but why bother?
I bought one of these desks as well. I also use it at just about 41 inches when standing.
I think the desk sways a bit more than the article says. That said, I would imagine using a sturdier monitor stand (or an arm clamped to the desk) would counteract that enough to make it more comfortable.
For less than ~$250, I couldn't find a comparable sit/stand desk.
I'm pretty sure that rootless is a good thing. I've seen Macs bricked by seemingly harmless operations like changing important permission settings, or by damaged installer packages.
Locking the system down will make it a bit harder to shoot yourself in the foot. Besides the obvious advantage of reducing the attack surface of vulnerabilities.
That won't brick your OS X installation. Just boot from external drive and fix the permissions. It's not really that hard, and there is even a recovery partition exactly for problems like that.
So how does the installer deal with files that are installed in say /usr/bin that should not be there? Does it leave them there or does it move them? Does it put "rootless" attribute on them?
Can you turn off rootless during installation or is this post installation thing only?
Does rsync backup continue to work with rootless? I have a feeling that booting from external partition and restoring from backup won't work for system files with rootless attribute on them.
I'm a developer at a company called PriceWaiter[1] that provides a similar “Make an Offer” service to existing eCommerce stores. Our API allows retailers to add a button to any product on their site to get offers from customers.
We welcome Amazon into this space, and are really glad to see this idea catching on.
Check out our developer docs and integration plugins[2], or feel free to ask any questions you have here.
