How about you address the points they responded to you with instead of sarcasm?
You asked for details, you got details, now you avoid - so you really seem firmly indoctrinated into an unchallenged ideology - seemingly because you refuse to engage and update your knowledge/understanding?
If you put just a bit more effort in and actually respond to people's points, including my previous ones, then I'll be willing to then expend more of my energy and answer your specific question - but it seems to just be another strategy you developed to avoid. Avoiding will only prevent you from developing your critical thinking and broaden-deepen your understanding through other people's perspectives.
Internet would be like this 80% if you used PC and avoid social media scrollholes. The infinite scroll of phone app is the adictive cancer. Internet usage with PC is like slow food.
Plastic is a superior packaging material. It delivers superb cleanlines and posibility to use packaging gas(Nitrogen) in automated lines. Cleanliness is essential for shelf life, and many products have it now unheard compared to 80s paper packaging - only due to package. Amount of food spoilage prevented by plastic packaging is enormous, it is very sad to see this no plastic hysteria. Like seing dark ages returning.
I agree with you. Plastic is one of those weird issues where it gets much more prominence than it deserves. Plastic reduces food waste and items damaged in shipping. If you don't litter and have a good landfill system, there is nothing to worry about.
Whats the point of marriage then if being able you refuse kids? It's designed as a secure hub to build greater things like children bearing family. Why to subject yourself to lonely elderly life, tied to aging partner? Be like gay/bachelor people and enjoy hundreds of partners, why try to mimic family being afraid for full experience?
Assuming that you're not trolling:
1. Plenty of gay people have stable monogamous relationships/marriages.
2. Marriage isn't only for children. Marriage has legal and tax implications.
3. I like having a stable relationship, I don't like dating and switching partners. I like deeper connections with my partners.
Most gay marriages are non monogamous, so your point is ‘plenty’ misleading. Marriage is legally less beneficial for men in the us (divorce lawyer is paid by the men), and marriages don’t mean stable relationships. An emotional marriage is likely less stable than a cohabitation.
> Several research studies show that about 50% of gay male couples are monogamous and about 50% allow for sex outside of the relationship. The research finds no difference in the level of happiness or stability among these groups.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/13/sweden-gang-vi... https://www.euronews.com/2023/09/28/3-killed-in-shootings-an... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_grenade_attacks_in_Swe... https://www.statista.com/statistics/1177271/number-of-report...