he must have meant to 'sanitize' or 'filter'

process inheritance was the best invention, because it models reality quite close. you dont have new things just sitting in an empty universe all alone and initialize everything themself from ... somewhere ... because everything is reset around them.

environment (in a broader sense, not just environment variables, but also CWD, file handles, uid/gid, sec context, namespaces) is there for a reason: to use. if you dont want your children processes to read the stdin in place of you, dont give it to them. it's the parent process responsibility to set up the env for the children.

although subprocesses are invented to do (some of) the parent's job by delegating smaller steps and leave the details to them. for example a http server would read the request (first) line, then delegate the rest of the input to a subprocess (worker) depending on who is free, who handles which type of request, etc. this is original idea behind inheritance, IMO.

…said some Trojans when accepted the Greek's gift horse

If I connect thousands of machines, will my terminal be flooded? Or have they thought of this?

Hungarian:

"zicherájsz tű" [zixɛra:ʲs ty:] < "zicher" (Deutsch) + "tű" in Hungarian meaning "pin"

"biztostű" [bistoʃ ty:] in de-germanized form and "biztosító tű" [bistoʃi:to: ty:] in more formal register.

sorry, it's "sicher" in German

rdp client actually has an option to remove the remote desktop's wallpaper

True, but at least in my attempts, that setting only affects picture backgrounds and is ignored when using solid color backgrounds.

those are the same people who let the user change those settings.

in what sense does it relies on "religion" (and which religion) to "you may sustain your life by killing and eating animals, AND by killing and using their organs if you garbaged yours (which you should avoid anyways)" which is reasoned with nature's observed behaviur of each species seem to absolutely protect their own at the expense of other species? exception are just those, exceptions. but the overarching rule is to be "selfish". if there would be any religion which contradict this is Christianity which teaches that you are not only should sustain you and your family/tribe/species but also the whole Earth, animals, plants we are entrusted with; so preferencing our own species is not absolute.

(i'm not addressing the parent post's author personally)

i start to consider this "human value == intelligence" line of thinking as hate speech, eugenetics-based racism, and endorsement of violence. no. human value is not based solely on intelligence level (whatever that would be - i doubt if scientists even broadly agree what intelligence is and how to measure it), but on being the member of the homo species. period. nothing else. a human is a human even he was born without an actual brain organ in his skull. stop killing the future of humanity.

The trouble with emotional arguments is they eventually give way to the overwhelming utility of science-based thinking. A lot of people are against genetic modification on an emotional level but our planet wouldn't even support 7 billion people if it hadn't been developed.

i not quite can connect the "not intentionally killing humans" topic with the "allow GM crops grow more food with less labour" topic which i think your reply is about but also not sure that it is.

NNCP peers may be completely untrusted, but in this case don't expose weak nncp-exec command to those peers.

for example these is an `exec: /usr/bin/tar` command exposed for Alice, but not for Eve. For Eve there may be an `exec: /usr/local/bin/file-request-handler-for-untrusted-peers.sh` command available which adds the access control layer.

ForceCommand accepts user parameters except via environment variables.