Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | archy_'s comments login

Original title was too long, but for posterity, it was: "Communities that experience mass shootings drink more alcohol in the aftermath, a new study finds"


Great for bars.


The whole train DRM saga has been endlessly entertaining as someone looking in from afar, but I can only imagine the stress this must place on operators trying to keep trains maintained with this dagger dangling over their heads. I wish I could hack a train, thats a once in a lifetime opportunity and would make for an incredible "2 truth and a lie" type story

Also available at https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-we-ve-not-been-trained-for-this-...

Previous coverage:

"37C3 - Breaking "DRM" in Polish trains" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrlrbfGZo2k

"O trzech takich, co zhakowali prawdziwy pociąg – a nawet 30 pociągów" https://zaufanatrzeciastrona.pl/post/o-trzech-takich-co-zhak...

Mastodon post by q3k https://social.hackerspace.pl/@q3k/111528162462505087


That's just pre-provisioning by another name, auto-scaling implies on-the-fly provisioning

E: I can't even load the fly.dev website, it keeps timing out. I guess they forgot to pre-provision/under-provisioned it


No, they have auto-scaling as well. Not sure what GP was talking about: https://fly.io/docs/reference/autoscaling/

However, it's understandable that some people wouldn't necessarily want to pay for high amounts of max machines.

Apparently it doesn't auto-scale automatically either, you have to opt into it.


When I read about these things, I cant help but wonder if anybody took a step back and thought "maybe we just have too much code"?

At some point, perhaps you're just doing too much


There isn't too much code till the point we have automated asteroid mining.


Career limiting thoughts.


Product and profit limiting too, if you're deleting profitable code for aesthetic reasons.


Ive noticed the same and wonder if this is the natural result of public codebases on average being simpler since small projects will always outnumber bigger ones (at least if you ignore forks with zero new commits)

If high quality closed off codebases were used in training, would we see an improvement in LLM quality for more complex use cases?


I don't trust any project with a Discord listed so prominently

Give me a forum (even Discourse will do) , I'm tired of needing 3rd party spyware to interact with developers. That it is all closed off from search engines makes it even worse


Original title (had to clip it to meet the character limit): Aaron Wagner And Wags Capital: From Pro Football To Utah’s Latest Disgraced Financial Influencer


Isn't that just a nationalist version of a ponzi scheme?


Original title was too long, but for posterity, it was: "Model G" as the original designation for IBM Model M & the existence of Models "1A" and "1B"


The article is commentating on this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uSVVCmOH5w


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: