Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | appel's comments login

> When I learned a subscription for home security was $75/mo I said “there has to be something out there” and there was.

Can I ask what it was you found?


Heck you can even cobble stuff together with Home Assistants and various door/window/presence/water/humidity sensors. I was able to build a notification system when doors, windows, or fence gates are open. Same with panic buttons that alert my SO if any of us need assistance when putting kids to bed without whipping out the phones.

All of that can be loaded into HASS using a $26 Sonoff Zigbee dongle and various Zigbee devices like Aqara and others.


ADT; there’s a program through my employer where employees get deals and so I made first contact with them. I chatted with a salesperson who walked me through a sign up process before I could ask any questions (I made contact saying I wanted to inquire about services and then said we couldn’t talk until he collected all my information).

He said normally it’s $100/mo but with this deal, it’s $75/mo.

No thanks. $900/yr to $1200/yr + installation fee for home security kinda stinks. I was told the equipment wouldn’t work if I didn’t have the subscription.

I’m sure I was taken for a ride too, being told false information (the equipment really wouldn’t work? It’s really $75/mo?). I indeed felt like I was being treated like a mark. At the end I said delete my information but honestly I doubt they did. But who cares because now I got myself into this pretty fun world of home automation and security through Home Assistant and self hosting.


I think they're referring to Home Assistant, that's what they found


Have you looked at Konnected? Really great if you already have a system installed but dead like I do.


Frigate is worth looking at as well if you have RTSP cameras as part of your security solution.


Another commenter linked to the archived version of the Substack post: https://archive.is/2024.12.09-230659/https://breloomlegacy.s...



All this is truly, truly outstanding, except for one bit:

> Cat doors allow cats access to bedrooms when human doors are closed.

Kenton, you have made a grave mistake.


Hopefully the cat doors can be locked too!


The kids' cat doors have latches so they can lock them.

The primary bedroom's cat door technically is lockable but I don't know why I'd ever lock it!

The lower-level bedroom's cat door doesn't have a lock, but you could easily put something heavy in front of the door to block it.


Fair, definitely depends on the cat(s). Our cats will frequently decide to start rough-housing on the bed at 3am, so unfortunately we have to keep them out of the bedroom at night lest our sleep quality suffers drastically. They also need to be kept out for "adult playtime", because otherwise they like to get involved and that isn't the vibe we're going for.


Excellent article and absolutely fair points by the author. As a kid I completely fell in love with the characters and ambiance, but got hopelessly stuck in Act 1. In fact, I don't think I ever made it out.

But man, what a great story and what a beautiful style. I always half expected to see Hollywood pick this up and turn it into a movie. Just imagine what the folks at Pixar could do with this (with Tim Schafer as executive producer, of course).


It’s much too eccentric for the Pixar formula. They are family movies first and foremost. Characters need to be understandable and relatable to an eight-year-old.

The Pixar movie with similar themes is 2016’s “Coco”. It’s a fine production, but the themes are much less adult than in Grim Fandango.


Google's trade-in estimates for the P9 Pro:

Pixel Fold (256/512): $760

Pixel 8 Pro (128/256/512/1TB): $699

Pixel 8 (128/256): $490

Pixel 7a: $300

Pixel 7 Pro (128/256/512): $540

Pixel 7 (128/256): $360

Edit: there's a complete overview of all trade in estimates in this post: https://slickdeals.net/f/17689866-buy-pixel-9-pro-or-pixel-9...


If you're a Google Fi member, they have a nice discount on the price of the phone - but the trade-in value of your existing phone looks to be halved. I can get the Pixel 9 Pro XL with 256GB of storage for $750, but I only get $150 towards my Galaxy S22+.


Not bad, really. My Pixel 6 was being flaky a month ago (not playing sounds reliably), and I needed to fix it right then, so I bought a Pixel 8 from Best Buy for $549+tax and got $220+tax back (described as $70 valued price + $150 promotional) for trading in my Pixel 6. If you consider the $70 as the true value of my flaky Pixel 6, you could say I only paid $399 (plus tax) for the Pixel 8, and now Google's offering me $490 for it if I buy a Pixel 9.

Even so I'm not sure the Pixel 8 -> Pixel 9 upgrade is worth $799 - $490 = $309 (plus tax) to me when the Pixel 8 is brand new and working well.


I have a P8Pro and it may well be worth the money to trade it in, especially to get a slightly more manageable sized phone.


I think it's a good deal. After-tax price is ~$1082, trade-in is $699, with a $200 store credit ($300 with a Google 1 sub), and $21 back from 2% credit card rewards. So ~$162 cost, which is not much more than the increase in trade-in value. Plus the 1 year of Gemini Advanced and maybe some YouTube premium months.

The main downside is that store credit expires in 1 year. Also I hate buying new phone cases.


Yeah, that sounds perfect. To go from my 256GB P8 to a 256GB P9 Pro would cost me about $610 + 10% tax after trade-in which I don't think I'll have the stomach for.


Best Buy just gave me $1099 plus a $200 gift card for my S23 Ultra, when buying a Pixel 9 Pro XL.


I'm glad they finally went this route. I can't be the only one who usually wants the specs of the Pro but always opts for the smallest phone (p1, p3, p5 & now p8).


Pretty much in the same boat here. The P9P is around the same size as my P8 (0.1" shifted from depth to width), which is great news. I would pay more for a better camera, but I care more about compactness than camera quality.


My issues is the smallest of pixel phones are still to big. I don't want anything bigger than the smallest Pixel 4 ideally.

I've moved to FairPhone anyway because there are concerns more important than compactness.


Indeed, it's a good choice. My wife has been routinely annoyed that the phone with superior specs was/is always uncomfortably large for her hands.


As likely anyone on HN is to hold: I have a bunch of old phones.

How harvest sensors, cams, thingamathings and have a new cadre of people who can build plans to take sensor THING from PHONEA and CAMERA from PHONEB and etc... and build a thing where these already known devices can be harvested and incorporated into projects, products, etc... and not landfil.?


The funny thing is the Fold is actually the smallest phone by height, and the thickness change isn't as big as you'd think...


The price change, on the other hand…


I did that with the Pixel 8. Although I don't really care about the better camera either.


Same. I wish you could get a Galaxy S Ultra, with the stylus in a smaller size.


Isn’t this equivalent to just not offering you the smaller, lower spec phone then? Per your decision tree?


I'm so sorry. I only learned about Jake due to his post the other day. I understood this was coming but still felt shock and sadness when I learned just now he has passed. Wishing you much strength.


I miss Edge. I might still be using it if it wasn't for uBlock Origin and Manifest v3.


> computers are a very important form of technology. Without it no websites, no Roblox studio, and no nothin.

Well put, Naya!


I'm probably showing my age, but I'm just at awe what is possible in a browser in this day and age. Well done, OP. I'd love a hashed out, full length version of this, but with the same vector graphics.


I mean, WebGL was released in 2011, so this kind of thing was possible for like 13 years. If you go back once again as much, to 1998, the web has barely existed back then.

There were things, like Epic Citadel, a full port of Unreal Engine to the browser (using asm.js, a technique of compiling assembly to Javascript) a decade ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9KRBuVBjVo

And yeah even that somehow feels futuristic today.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: