Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | andybak's commentslogin

I can't quite parse the second sentence but in any case "everyone" makes the statement obviously false whatever you intended to claim.


Hard to believe a platform that blackholes anything that counters the safespace design.

But do you have a point you want to make?

If yes, it is not obvious to me.


This is a very important point and mostly absent from the conversation.

We have many words that almost mean the same thing or can mean ment different things - and conversations about intelligence and consciousness are riddled with them.


> This is a very important point and mostly absent from the conversation.

That's because when humans are mentioned at all in the context of coding with “AI”, it's mostly as bad and buggy simulations of those perfect machines.


> Use with your ChatGPT plan

It's asking me to buy credits but I'm already on Plus?


Got past that but now hitting the bad request error that lots of people seem to have

You will be foiled by a regex

Can you explain?

sed 's/—/ /g'

How so

I thought I was making a fairly obvious jokey riposte?

"If you're claiming that em dashes are your method for detecting if text is AI generated then anyone who bothers to do a search/replace on the output will get past you."


Is that not Codex? Or do you specifically mean the CLI interface?

Codex is a joke. It was rushed out and is not competitive.

edit: They've now added Codex CLI usage in Plus plans!


It is a pretty serious problem. New model with no product to effectively demo it.

Isn't that still priced via API usage?

No, they finally included Codex usage in the subscription pricing.

The CLI. Wasn't included in the Plus plan last I checked.

Codex CLI works fine on a plus plan. It's not as good as Claude (worse at coding), likely even with gpt-5.

Not live for me in the UK. "Try it in ChatGPT" takes me to the normal page and there's no v5 listed in the dropdown.

I just got the same thing in the US too. (Am on the $20/month subscription.)

Seeing words like "spatial" and "immersive" I was rather expecting it to run on at least one headset?

Yea, it’s primarily designed for headset or AR glasses, but it can also function as a special web browser for desktop platforms (e.g., macOS). By default, the window is a 3D space where you interact with web content (both 2D & 3D).

You can download the macOS version I just compiled today from https://m-creativelab.github.io/jsar-runtime/download.html. Try opening a supported web page with it, such as: https://github.com/M-CreativeLab/jsar-runtime/tree/main/fixt....


So is there a build that can run on a headset? Preferably not a Vision Pro as I don't have access to one.

Hey, If you have a Rokid ARLite, it comes with JSAR by default and can be used directly. For other AOSP-based devices, such as the Meta Quest, you may need to use the JSAR SDK to develop a new Unity applications yourself: https://m-creativelab.github.io/jsar-runtime/manual/referenc...

I'm still rather baffled. It's an immersive/spatial browser but it only runs on a Mac desktop and an AR headset I've never heard of. Can you see why people might be confused?

You're absolutely right - the current situation of this project can indeed be confusing. Thank you for bringing this up! Would you mind sharing which XR devices you'd ideally like to see JSAR support? I'd be happy to prioritize building a compatible version for your preferred platform in my roadmap.

Why not just target OpenXR on either Android or Windows? The former would probably cover 95% of users.

Actually, on our own AR devices, JSAR uses OpenXR to enable mixed rendering of web content and Unity scenes together. JSAR itself is a browser engine library, and it currently works in any AOSP + GLES3 environment (which should cover most devices except Vision Pro and Windows). However, I haven’t built a full browser app specifically for mainstream VR devices like the Meta Quest, as the project’s main focus right now is on implementing missing web standards.

I’ve also updated a detailed explanation about this issue—if you’re interested, you can read it here: https://m-creativelab.github.io/jsar-runtime/manual/quick-st...


What about WebXR ?

Also RP1 have a Metaverse Browser they are working on (see https://rp1.com/) could be interesting to discuss with them


Currently, JSAR supports rendering WebXR content along with basic Input Sources (including Hand Tracking on XR devices).

Thank you for the recommendation! After having experienced RP1, it appears to be a large-scale web spatial application. I believe JSAR could potentially integrate other WebXR content within environments like RP1's expansive space - which would be quite fascinating. However, to run within JSAR, RP1 would need to support OVR_multiview rendering.


there is an active WebXR discord server you might get some feedback there too (I posted your project on cool finds channel btw ;) : https://discord.gg/xGKhKhSrDX

That's great, thank you for sharing this project!

> Read Brave New World if you haven't.

I have and I don't see the connection with AI-assisted coding.

If your comment was about "generative AI in general" then I think this is the problem with trying to discuss AI on the internet at the moment. It quickly turns into "defend all aspects of AI or else you've lost". I can't predict all aspects of AI. I don't like all aspects of AI and I can't weigh up the pros and cons of a vast number of distinct topics all at once. (and neither, I suspect, can anyone else)


Genuinely - what's the problem with this? It seems to be someone documenting a big increase in their productivity in a way that might be actually useful to others.

They don't write like the kind of person you can dismiss out of hand and there's no obvious red flags.

Other than "I don't like AI" - what is so insufferable here?


I sometimes use a VR headset instead of a monitor but I do end up using a laptop because of the keyboard and touchpad.

I can conceive of using maybe a phone, an ultra light headset and a compact keyboard and TouchPad combined?

I'm usually connecting to a real computer over remote desktop however!


My workplace forces me to use a virtual windows VM atm, which I'm usually connecting from an MacBook Pro.

I recently wanted to try using such an XR glasses (viture) and just use a Bluetooth keyboard/trackpad and connect from my phone. It would make teethering unnecessary as an additional plus.

While it worked, it was super janky because mobile devices are still not optimized for desktop use... The VM screen was effectively limited by the phone resolution which was mirrored by the glasses. Couldn't get it to work without the mirroring...

If it was less janky I would definitely use that for some business trips. Currently? Nope.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: