Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aargh_aargh's commentslogin



Thanks! Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44787631, which has that post.

(Sorry to error404x - it's on our list to do a better job of merging related posts such as these.)


Good, no problem. I just shared what I saw on Hugging Face.


Does any Linux terminal have a comparable integration? I'm still using GNU Screen but willing to give tmux another shot.


WezTerm

The author of this feature also ported it to the Windows Terminal.

Besides, Chrome OS’s built in terminal also has tmux integration.


Do you have links to any examples? I've searched for this on and off for years, and i use Wezterm, but i've never been able to make it work like i remember the iTerm2 integration working.

Would love for examples using Windows Terminal as well.


I downloaded it to try it and it basically worked out of the box. What did you try?


Wait, how do you use it with Windows terminal? Same SSH config?


In fact, Windows Terminal has an open issue for the CC mode: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/3656

There was one called Terminator which had some tmux like features, split panes, broadcast, etc. It's not been maintained in a bit.

https://gnome-terminator.org/


I used to use terminator for a long time, but i've switched to tilix (https://gnunn1.github.io/tilix-web/) with little pain.


I'll check it out.

Note: that Terminator I linked is a re-boot (I'll be back) so, I might give it another go as well.


I was a huge tilix fan for ages, but ran into an issue with long URLs being unclickable.


wezterm


I use happily GNU Screen. Keep it?


Pretty sure iTerm is the only term that implements that tmux protocol.


ITerm2 seems really cool, it has so many features. The developer(s?) must be really productive, they churn it out. They support a lot of Kitty protocols for example.


Ghostty has infrastructure to support it from my understanding, like Mitchell did the initial plumbing. It just takes a spirited individual to finish it up.


Tangent: godbolt.org greeted me with a popup but boy, I have never seen a clearer privacy notice, minimal possible data retention, including a diff with the last version. Great job, Matt!



That bears no relation to OpenAI using data for training purposes. Although the court’s decision is problematic, user data is being kept for legal purposes only, and OpenAI is not authorized to use it to train its models.


you must be naive to think OpenAI does not train on your data, Altman is infamous for deceiving claims.


I mean, using data that has been explicitly opted out of training paves the way for lawsuits and huge administrative fines in various jurisdictions. I might be naive, but I don’t think that’s something OpenAI would deliberately do.



Call me long in the tooth but it sounds to me like he's describing HTML (sans the backlinks part).


But there's no way to click from the short to the long video. I'd like to do that. It's someone else doing the cuts, presumably for their own benefit, rather than to promote the original.


Shorts creators can link back to the full video, assuming both are posted on the same channel. You can't link to someone else's video though.

Also, a channel that posts shorts exclusively needs like 30 million views to be monetized, you're infinitely more likely to reach that threshold creating compilation of cute cat videos than with your own original content (regardless of the niche). I'd be shocked if even 2% of channels earning money from shorts create any original content what so ever.


It's a different calling convention. Call by value rather than call by name.


What about Vega?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: