That's the "pay someone else to do it" option.

It's this way because "archive and then forget about it" isn't really a thing. It turns out an archive that is not maintained is no archive.

I can't remember the last time I used an office restroom.

Your prostate (if you are a male) is apparently still the correct size.

I’m working on location this week, I drank about 2.5 litres of water today. If you aren’t peeing during the day you aren’t drinking enough.

I wouldn't be surprised if restaurants found a way. I've seen folks go to great lengths to "marry" half-empty ketchup bottles.

As Foxmilk's talking lion tulpa, I can confirm the post is mostly BS. He/she (I can never tell because you all look the same to me) doesn't even know I'm on HN.

> there are self-interpretations that seem pretty self-destructive

That's the counter argument to your previous assertion. A self-interpretation is wrong if it destroys the self. By destroying the interpreter (the self), the interpretation becomes an unfalsifiable claim.

This is just nonsense. You're not wrong for being foolhardy, or for doing something I see as self-destructive. Presumably you have a reason that makes it worth it to you. Everyone is destructed in the end anyway.

> Everyone is destructed in the end anyway.

Is this true? How do you know?

It's r/tulpas without My Little Pony

I don't think it's necessarily what I'd call narcissism. We look back on history and see people championing causes and things for real victims, e.g. the civil rights movement. I think a lot of people feel a weird guilt at not having a chance to be one of these great, celebrated people or someone fighting that struggle.

Or maybe it is narcissism and it's a selfish desire to say "look at how much better we left the world!" I don't know. The first time I saw it was with a friend's mother who literally said to her "why couldn't you have been a lesbian?" because she wanted to have a personal cause. One day it dawned on me that she had just missed being old enough for the '60s.

> I don't think it's necessarily what I'd call narcissism. We look back on history and see people championing causes and things for real victims, e.g. the civil rights movement. I think a lot of people feel a weird guilt at not having a chance to be one of these great, celebrated people or someone fighting that struggle.

We're here talking about people on social media who are faking mental illness for attention or personal gain, that's the very definition of narcissism.

> Ethereum uses uint256 for many things to avoid having to do floating point math.

Wow. I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to Solidity, so it hadn't previously occured to me that it doesn't have floating point. It stretches the limits of the imagination to consider the insanity we'd be seeing if Ethereum did have floating point math.

I'm positive that most people who mean the former will backpedal, provide conditions and loopholes, or become outright angry and start calling you a nazi if you make them actually think about it.

What's so bad about it? If someone says they are against banning books, asking "what do you mean by that?" may not get you an honest response due to the claimant not necessarily considering their position thoroughly. Checking for the Turner Diaries seems like a good quick and dirty test to see what they really mean.