I think they are aiming to show AI can make movies faster and cheaper, with a budget under $30 million and a nine month timeline. It’s a bold move, but some worry it might feel less human or spark job concerns.
Meta employees have raised serious issues about the company downplaying or even suppressing research on child safety risks, especially in virtual reality spaces.
They said that the company suppressed research on child safety risks, especially in VR. Meta denies it, but it’s a serious concern
Would those same employees (assuming they get stock based compensation) be happy to forgo capital gains that have/would be achieved by said firm that has increased its wealth by not investing in child safety projects? Thats what would happen if reinvestment was increased.
I worked on Integrity at Meta for 4 years, including a stint on the child safety team.
Absolutely, I would have been fine with the stock not growing as fast (it would still have grown, Meta has billions of users), as would every single one of the IC's I regularly worked with.
Its much easier to vote with your feet than to get Mr Zuckerberg to change.
So why didnt you? Thats my question.
IM guessing you worked in London? I met a few PMs from Meta. And just to put it mildly, they fit the description of what I described - gave a big talk about how bad it was inside, but when faced with the option of walking and giving away monetary gains - nah. Self interest is king.
Whether you like it or not, or want to admit it, you have profited handsomely from a firm that has caused a great deal of harm / and in many cases has intentionally created an environment that has heightened the senses, for financial gain.
I also saw you joined circa 2020 and have enjoyed the rapid growth in share price - and left just on the 4 year mark, enjoying the SBC to the max. Easy to say that you'd give all that up, after you received the gains and left.
You are also creating a contorted argument to hold onto your blame, making a bonfire out of your credibility. Which is possibly why you are using a new account?
I think spending 30 minutes with a stranger can be surprisingly powerful. You never know what perspective, idea, or connection might come from an unexpected conversation.
I remember that once spent 30 minutes with a stranger at a cafe who turned out to be a trader in a completely different market than mine. In that short conversation, I picked up a few strategies and a perspective on risk management I’d never considered before. It reminded me that sometimes the most valuable insights come from unexpected places and just half an hour with the right person can change how you approach your work.
Fintech vs Banks isn’t just a rivalry but it’s shaping the future of finance. Startups bring speed, innovation, and customer focus, while banks bring trust, scale, and regulatory strength. The real future? A hybrid model where collaboration fuels innovation and the competition keeps everyone sharp.
What do you think? Will fintechs and banks be friends, foes, or both?
FusionAuth and AI together are a perfect example of how technology can enhance security and personalization. Like in banking, AI works best as a partner to humans, improving efficiency, detecting risks, and creating smarter experiences without replacing people.
More insights here: "The Rise of AI in Banking: Friend or Foe" on finance gossips
I’m not surprised. AI tools have become such a huge time saver. I use them a lot too, but I still double check everything to keep quality high. I read an article on finance gossips called “The Rise of AI in Banking: Friend or Foe”, and it really put this into perspective. AI’s growth in finance shows how quickly it is reshaping industries, so seeing devs rely on AI for half their code makes total sense. Like in banking, it’s not about replacing humans but creating smarter systems, as long as we manage trust, ethics, and transparency, it’s a tool to level us up, not phase us out.
As a trader using AI, I see defect detection the same way I approach market analysis: data first, decisions second. You start by collecting and cleaning solid data (like price action in trading), label and train your model, then stress test it in real world scenarios. Once integrated, you keep refining it just like tweaking a trading strategy. The real edge is in continuous feedback loops: the AI keeps learning, spotting defects faster and with more accuracy over time, which is exactly how I stay ahead in the markets too.
This is me Rian Atheer. I just read that article on finance gossips website "How AI Is Changing the Way We Trade and Analyze Crypto Markets" and as a trader, it made me realize AI isn’t something to fear but it’s just a tool. I’ve been using AI bots to track the market 24/7, but I’ve learned they only work well when I combine them with my own research and instincts. It’s all about balance, not blindly trusting technology. There are benefits as well that comes with trading through AI and those who know the usage are getting their benefits.
That sounds interesting! I’d love to hear more about what the Visual AI flow manager does and how testers can get involved.
Passive Income with Crypto in 2025 isn’t just about “buy low, sell high” anymore. Investors are staking, lending, farming, and exploring DeFi tools to earn steady returns—even in sideways or bearish markets. With traditional yields low and inflation still a concern, crypto offers higher potential rewards. Read more on financegossips website
That’s a solid breakdown of how crypto can actually work for you instead of just sitting in your wallet. In 2025, staking and lending feel like the safest entry points for most people, while yield farming is great if you’re comfortable with higher risk. The key is research, diversification, and only using reputable platforms. Personally, I like the idea of staking ETH or using liquid staking so I can stay flexible while earning rewards. You can read more on Finance Gossips webiste
