Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more Qantourisc's comments login

There is still the option to mandate both. (No unfair tried, and a fair trial.)


Rent is indeed the real killer, it takes waaaay to much of the budget. It's the only thing that has not gotten more affordable. Maybe even worse over the year.


This is the irony. If people worked 4 hour days for the same salary, some would do two jobs to earn more, and then buy/rent bigger. This leads to an increase in rental costs a which means that working 2x 4 hour jobs is essential to get what 1 4 hour job used to get.

The same phenomena has been seen over the last 30 years. When a parent (usually the mother) stayed at home houses were affordable on a single income. After both parents started working prices shot up, now it's essential for both to work, just to pay the extra rent/mortgage. This pushes childbirth later in life, if at all, and means that children are brought up as a factory process rather than parenting.

In the UK this is explicitly encouraged by tax breaks for outsourcing childcare, taxpayer funded childcare, and penalising single working parents through the tax system (60% marginal tax on £50k household income with 1 earner, 33% on £50k household income with two earners, but no way to share tax subsidies)


Healthcare, daycare, and college tuition have not gotten more affordable either. Probably other things as well. But those have gotten much worse.


It's not because the model is broken / wrong. That it no-longer holds any information.

Example: witches didn't float, yet you can probably assign some properties that would cause people to label them as such.


I don't think it's the equivalent, I suspect it's the exact code being ran.


Rules to live by for strangers. Rules to die by for keeping/making friends.


If you want to be a cipher instead of a human being, maybe.


Sure: discredits other (an thus increases your status), people like complaining (increase your like-ability), feeds people interest (people return for more) -> better relationships. More chance to live.

Personally I am applaud by such behaviour. Even telling second hand is a no-go unless you know the source would be willing to tell the other person.


I think you're ignoring the fact that the person who is doing the gossiping can also be the subject of gossip. If you gain a reputation for spreading untrue negative assessments about others, then you could end up being the subject of ostracism as that behavior also can lead to results that are harmful for the group.

Which, of course, can lead to even more complex "gaming" of the system, but only to the point where the amount of effort you put in outweighs the minimum acceptable level of effort you could otherwise put into the work itself.


"Personally I am applaud" - looks like a Freudian slip.

But yeah - you are right - on personal level it is pretty obvious.


s/applaud/appalled Sorry I never write this word in English.


Nice list.

BTW the current models often fail practically at #3 getting a repair would often be easier, instead of a long road to recovery ;)


Has shipping patients with the required information been considered ?


Possible problems with GMO: - Harder to digest proteins - Possible new allergies for some people (because if slightly different proteins, or mixes from other plants) - Plants with build in pesticide - Patents - Plant monoculture - Plants that grow faster and are cheaper, but not optimized for taste.

Is the above list inherit to GMO's: no. Do I know if the GMO I am eating is suffering from this: no. As such until I get detailed information about your GMO, I prefer to avoid it.


You don't know if modern non-GMO crops have these problems, either; transgenic (“GMO”) crops actually have greater controls than modern non-transgenic (“non-GMO”, though their genetics are, in fact, artificially modified) crops in many ways.

It's completely irrational to focus on “GMOs”.


Wait, you listed some hypotheticals, said they don't necessarily apply, and still concluded they do?

But what do I know. I'm a food contrarian - if I see two items, one labeled "no GMO" and one without such label, I pick the latter...


> and still concluded they do?

When did they do this?


The way I read that comment was:

- [list of possible problems with GMOs]

- Are they inherent to GMOs? No.

- Do I know if a given GMO has them? No.

- Conclusion: I will avoid GMOs.


BTW I had to move to tmpfs to keep this CPU busy when building Gentoo stuff.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: