I'm local, I know a ton of former Lexmark people, because they've already been all-but dead in Lexington for some time. They mostly only did R&D here for decades, and that group has been dwindling.
Large groups of Ex-Lexmark folk have ended up in other local tech companies, many ended up at OpenText (via HP via Exstream, the eventual successful startup from a local serial entrepreneur that basically makes the tools to do semi-individualized bulk mailing like bills), Badger (robots for doing retail work) was founded by folks leaving Lexmark, etc.
Amazon has been buying up their old buildings (long, long ago it used to be a sprawling IBM campus that did typewriters, printers, keyboards, compilers, EMI testing...) as they contract.
Like much of the US, Lexington has lost a bunch of manufacturing, but IBM/Lexmark as a major entity is already long gone.
It is funny that they've been bought by a cartridge cloner, and foreign private equity, and are now being bought by a competitor, they keep dying in new ignominious ways.
I really want to know what the deal is with OpenText (formerly MicroFocus). If you're not careful they will eventually buy your business and you will disappear.
> OpenText offers cloud-native solutions in an integrated and flexible Information Management platform to enable intelligent, connected and secure organizations.
It certainly is a bit of a novelty, but there are a few Theremin-featuring pieces that I find pleasing, a classic example is the Theremin and piano arrangement of Saint-Saens' The Swan.
Here is Clara Rockmore performing it (I think this is a video of the recording on The Art of the Theremin) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdFSU8sn3mo . There's a very nice arrangement of La vie en rose from the same sessions.
She developed a lot of the Theremin techniques and - despite some argument about how practical vs. performative they are - is likely the best Theremin player ever. She was previously trained as violinist and an answer to why you would _play_ a theremin: her tendinitis killed her violin career but could keep playing music with the force-less theremin.
> There are also a surprising number of well-known pop (etc.) songs that include a theremin somewhere.
There are definitely some strong uses of theremin in there, but after sampling a few I also found some that I don’t think are theremin at all, which makes me wonder if that’s a common theme - whether a good chunk of that list isn’t theremin, but other instruments.
For example, Wonderboy (Tenacious D) seems to be using a synth with portamento (aka glide), which is pretty common and does sound a little like theremin while the pitch is sliding, but ultimately gives a very different effect, mostly because when it reaches the target note, it holds the note strongly. Theremin’s effect tends to be disorienting because you can’t hold an exact note, so it’s either sliding around or people use a lot of vibrato.
Another one I confirmed is not Theremin is Lovely Head by Goldfrapp. Again, this vaguely sounds like it could be a theremin, but there are plenty of signs it’s either heavily processed and edited, or just not a theremin. My first guess was a guitar under heavy filtering or via MIDI, but then I found this: “ What is often mistaken for a theremin synth in the song is, in fact, Alison's vocals manipulated through a Korg MS-20 synthesiser.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lovely_Head
I love the Computer-Hosted-In-A-Computer products (for absolutely no good reason), I have both one of the education market Mac LCs with a IIe-on-a-chip in the PDS slot ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_IIe_Card ) and one of the slightly later PowerMac 6100/66 DOS with the first-party "Houdini II" 486 DOS card - The Houdini IIs are SoundBlaster 16 compatible (...ish) and the Is like the 610s bundled had kind of janky sound, so they're a little more "useful" (insomuch as a feeble 30 year old PC hosted in a 30 year old Mac is "useful").
The firmware is "uncanny valley" level mutant; it looks enough like a PC for DOS/3.1/95/98, and there are shim drivers to use the shared-in peripherals, but anything that does more direct hardware access will immediately notice it's not a PC and freak out ...that said, Despite claims that it's impossible, I did once get it to boot a minimal Linux system (IIRC some bullshit with a Tomsrtbt disc set and loadlin to chain load it from DOS, it was quite some time ago) - _barely_ functional, useless, but fun.
Amusingly, the vast majority of the DOS cards for Macs are lineally related, Phoenix Technologies designed the first gen cards for Apple, sold some aftermarket through AST Research, then Orange Micro bought the line from them and made most of the later aftermarket options.
...I'd love to complete the set and find a MacIvory/MicroExplorer or something, but I don't actually care for Lisp and the people who do have made the prices on working NuBus boards astronomical.
It is very likely the comment I'm replying to is not being obnoxious, but making a very deep cut reference to Orbital's song "Planet of the Shapes" from orbital2 that contains sample of the phrase in their comment, sampled from the movie "Withnail and I."
It might also be a commentary on The Guardian, but the wording is too specific.
(Sorry if I've spoiled your fun by clarifying, it was flagged when I read it, and shook loose a decades-old memory.)
Short answer: The legal situation in the early 90s made BSD unattractive right at the time where cheap microcomputers sufficient to host Unix-likes were proliferating, which allowed Linux to reach critical mass instead.
Too much detail answer:
In the 80s a lot of the commercial UNIX-likes were all or partly BSD derived, like DEC Ultrix, SunOS especially pre-Solaris, pieces of IBM/ISC's AIX, etc. and by the early 90s there were a bunch of BSD ports established or in progress for up-and-coming less expensive (..at least compared to minicomputers) workstations like HPBSD, SunOS, and the Tahoe system that fell through as the target for mainline 4.4BSD, and even commodity Microcomputers like 386BSD and BSD/386 once Intel offered a part with a usable MMU.
At this point _everyone and their dog_ derived their networking stack from BSD, because it was the reference OSI TCP/IP design and all the networking parts were permissively licensed. Even the Windows networking stack is BSD derived. That's still a thing, the Nintendo 3DS and Switch's in-house OS has a network stack that is derived from FreeBSD (though the rest of the OS isn't).
A few years later, MontaVista contributed a bunch of scalability work to Linux, and SGI and IBM who had recently bought Sequent contributed their even larger scaling and NUMA stuff to Linux as they bailed out of the Itanium Unix-brand-Unix Project Monterey (the later of which is what kicked off the SCO v. IBM lawsuit in 2003, but that was too late to kill inertia like the USL v. BSDi one did)... basically Linux got critical mass on features, vendor support, and hardware support by being in the right place at the right time and on relatively neutral ground relative to many long-standing divisions in the Unix world, and steamrolled the rest of the Unix market.
There was also a bunch of the common problem for permissively licensed stuff happening, in that the core folks got hired away by proprietary derivatives and choked the upstream. In the 80s a bunch of the core BSD folks left for Sun and built partially-incompatible partially-proprietary SunOS that was then superseded by the SVR4 based Solaris (SVR4 was _highly_ cross-pollinated with BSD, Xenix, and SunOS parts). Then a bunch of BSD folks spun BSDi to make commercial and partially proprietary releases (with squabbling about what would be proprietary), and the Jolitzes had a series of companies and... Then the Berkley CSRG that was the center of gravity for the BSD world closed up in 1995 (they had been winding down for years before that), and the post-4.4BSD community projects (FreeBSD, NetBSD, etc.) proliferated, with the usual open source squabbling keeping them not-very-unified.
As you note, the Next/Apple family has a lot of BSD code in it because the Mach folks at CMU derived most of their stack from BSD (and contributed back the BSD virtual memory system), and a lot of the people and code from that became the core of NeXTStep which became the core of OS X, and that lineage persists in nearly all of Apple's products and is occasionally re-synced with FreeBSD. You used to be able to get all the non-proprietary parts distributed as Darwin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system) , but Apple stopped doing that almost a decade ago and none of the forks have rooted.
There _are_ quite a number of other BSD derived proprietary OSes floating around that often don't go out of their way to note their relationship. The Sony Playstation 3/4/5 system software are hacked up FreeBSD derivatives. Juniper Junos that runs on a lot of fancy routers is FreeBSD derived (though recent releases have been migrating to Linux). Force10 (now part of Dell) and some Ericsson routers run NetBSD derived stacks. Etc.
A cheap AUE Chromebook flashed with UEFI makes a good (albeit rather storage-starved) Linux beater - but you'll have trouble with Haiku or any of the BSDs because the hardware is a little "quirky." The input devices in most of the currently-cheap x86 Chromebooks are plumbed over i2c in a slightly strange way that didn't even work entirely right on mainline Linux until fairly recently, and Bay/Cherry trail style half-SOC-half-external-codec style sound hardware that only mostly works in mainline Linux right now.
Just because I was beating on it at the time, I tried Haiku and NetBSD on a Dell Chromebook 3189 2-in-1 with Mr. Chromebox Coreboot back in August, and (quoting myself from https://pappp.net/?p=59407 ) Haiku R1B4 boots but sees no integrated input devices or sound, Haiku Nightly hrev57235 sees the mouse (which is interesting because it looks like the patch adding support should have been in R1B4), but it’s constantly drifting and spamming click events, and still no keyboard or sound. NetBSD9.0 loses track of its discs during boot, while 9.3 boots but with no integrated mouse/keyboard – there are patches under review in July ’23 to add support for them.
For about the same price as bare SBC or surplus SFF box, a hacked Chromebook gets you input devices, a display, a managed battery, and a usually rather rugged portable case, but no exposed GPIOs or UARTs or the like. For 3D printer controllers, streaming media endpoints, software experiments that might screw up the host so you don't want them on a machine you care about, and that sort of thing, they're a decent choice.
At least once one open-source OS supports a bit of hardware, the other ones can look in and see what they need to do. That doesn't prevent them from lacking the personpower to actually do it, but it drops the effort required to reverse engineer from scratch dramatically, if someone becomes interested enough.
I haven't gone as far as a straight razor, but I've just in the last few weeks switched to a DE razor coming from years of using cartridge razors with too many too closely spaced blades that clog then degrade and cause irritation.
I'm trying a Rockwell 6C (around $60) with its interchangeable base-plates for different aggressiveness on blade exposure/angle, and just started on a variety pack of blades to see what suits me - so far so good on the experiment, it's at very least not causing any more irritation and produces less waste. Shaving accessories _is_ a ridiculous rabbit hole of hipster consumerism, but doing better-than-default seems like it might be worthwhile.
Right now it's just for face, by my hair is rapidly approaching "Doonesbury's Old Surfer Dude" so the role might expand.
I generally hate dealing with bluetooth headphones (extra non-replaceable batteries to die then die! Extra drain on your phone battery! Run a unique ID tracking beacon all the time! Have a fight every time you want to switch sources! Pay more for inferior sound quality!), but the difference between the no-names and the mid-tier brands is shocking.
I've used a couple cheap wireless earbuds all of which were _awful_, and some over-ear TaoTronics headphones that are bluetooth-or-wired which are pretty OK, but I decided to try going up a tier and got a pair of Anker Soundcore Space A40 earbuds on sale for a bit over $50, and their ANC is _fabulous_, their pairing only rarely does something frustrating (they'll remember two different devices, which helps), they're actually reasonably comfortable despite being a larger object supported from the ear, etc.
One thing I realized the first time I had them on a flight is that the _lack_ of a simple way to hook them to a standard 3.5mm source is limiting - it means they can't take over for as many tasks from a wired pair as they otherwise could.
On the topic of headphones for loud environments: I've had mine for several years, but Plugfones (I have their Guardian model) are also a worthy object; earbuds which are also ANSI S3.19-1974 29db NRR hearing protection. Really nice for both noisy environments and working with power tools.
A bit late to the party, but in case you track replies, I can recommend the Avantree "Audikast Plus" device. Negligible weight, it gives you Bluetooth capability for two simultaneous headphones as long as you can plug it into a 3.5mm jack. I have been carrying it in my travel bag for years (the current model looks identical but is Bluetooth 5.0 compatible) and it makes our flights and hotel trips a delight (sound experience, I meant).
> they're actually reasonably comfortable despite being a larger object supported from the ear
On that note, there seems to be an explosion of "open-ear earbuds" going on right now - just between October and November, the amount of designs on Amazon seems to have doubled. These sit on your ear instead of inside it, and are a ton more comfortable. I couldn't stand normal earbuds and have been sticking to wraparounds, but these open-ear designs work for me.
This will be my 12th SC, every year except the virtual one (or was it two? I've genuinely lost track) since 2009.
It's a singular experience. Enormous. Part trade show, part conference, weird mix of deeply technical people, and IT manager types and the salescritters who prey on them, so there is a lot of intensely smart people and a lot of money floating around, not necessarily in the same places.
It historically was largely built around the national labs and their purchasing and use of very large systems, and that's still a major feature.
It feels like the population ratio has shifted from "people who work on computers" to "people who run work on computers" - a lower proportion of computer engineers, programmers, and top tier IT people, and a lot more folks running other people's code on other people's large systems, often with other people's data, which is a little strange.
There are still always a lot of interesting conversations with the people who are actually doing things to be had.
Large groups of Ex-Lexmark folk have ended up in other local tech companies, many ended up at OpenText (via HP via Exstream, the eventual successful startup from a local serial entrepreneur that basically makes the tools to do semi-individualized bulk mailing like bills), Badger (robots for doing retail work) was founded by folks leaving Lexmark, etc.
Amazon has been buying up their old buildings (long, long ago it used to be a sprawling IBM campus that did typewriters, printers, keyboards, compilers, EMI testing...) as they contract.
Like much of the US, Lexington has lost a bunch of manufacturing, but IBM/Lexmark as a major entity is already long gone.
It is funny that they've been bought by a cartridge cloner, and foreign private equity, and are now being bought by a competitor, they keep dying in new ignominious ways.