ChatGPT plagiarizes by copying other people's work. It does this by storing what it reads from people and conversations, and then using it. Basically, ChatGPT looks for ways to copy and paste other people's substance and present it as its own. It does this by grabbing text from all kinds of places, such as websites, books, and articles, and then using those words to create something new. In other words, ChatGPT has a large database stored with words, sentences and phrases that it can use to create its own work, which can sound like it was written by a human.
I agree it might potentially plagiarize some content. As in academia you cannot make a claim or present someone else's work or ideas as your own without referencing where you got the claim from. ChatGPT makes claims about things without referencing the original author/authors of that content.
However, not everything is considered plagiarism just because I read it somewhere and reproduced it somewhere else. If someone described something in detail on a forum and ChatGPT took that information from across the internet and reproduced it for me. That's not necessarily plagiarism.
My point being, there is an enormous amount of information on the internet that is free from plagiarism.
ChatGPT plagiarizes because it is a computer program that is programmed to copy sentences from other sources and paste them as its replies. The program does not truly understand what it is saying, so it sometimes repeats the same thing from other sources. Instead of making up its own sentences it just finds something similar from another source and copies it.
If you can manipulate the model into presenting you with an amount of copyrighted text that would count as infringement, it's clearly not the intention of the OP. In my attempts it shows, at most, a couple paragraphs. A quick Google search shows countless results that show a lot more. There is no way to meaningful infringe on the copyright with this tool.
Not sure why you're being rude and unproductive with this comment.
Except it is, and this website/tool meets all the criteria for Fair Use, at least in spirit. I'm not a judge or court so I'm not going to be pedantic on all the nuances of fair use.
Also copyright law is basically the IP equivalent of speed limit signs. They're constantly overly restrictive and people have a general respect for the concept of safe speed limits, but most people also don't give a shit to constantly follow speed limits 100% of the time because they recognize it's sort of ridiculous at times.
Also your claim on your LinkedIn isn't accurate: "the first and only word processor with phrasal templates and an artificially intelligent chat bot"
There are other GPT powered word processors out there that have these same features, including ones with tens of millions in funding.
Is this really how you want to represent yourself and your business in a public discussion? It's weird that you'd leave such a long trail of comments that are relatively toxic and rude and then have your full name and LinkedIn linked on your company's website.
If they are using a publicly available code, I don't think it is appropriate to accuse them of doxxing, anyone could just go to GitHub and find the snippet of code.
