Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | DesktopECHO's comments login

If anyone on Windows would like to see what performance is like, I updated my WSL installer scripts to use this version of XRDP.

Ubuntu XFCE: https://github.com/DesktopECHO/xWSL

KDE Neon: https://github.com/DesktopECHO/kWSL

Kali: https://github.com/DesktopECHO/Kali-xRDP

These scripts will build a complete RDP-accessible Linux desktop environment in WSL. A GPU isn't needed to see a significant performance gain over 'stock' XRDP.


That's client side. FreeRDP needs H.264 libraries to work with this branch of XRDP. Apparently, Ubuntu and variants do not include this in their FreeRDP builds, good to know it's in Debian though.

(MSTSC.EXE and the official macOS RDP client already have H.264 support built-in)


I believe your writeup is about enabling Glamor; it does not do anything to enable the H.264 "Clear Codec" branch of XRDP.

Apologies in advance if I'm wrong here, please correct me if I'm mistaken :)


That is already done in Fedora as far as I can tell - I have a couple of manually-built servers and can’t notice a difference.

But I have many more posts on RDP (check the footer back links)


I don't see anything with regards to inclusion of the Clear Codec (RDP8.1 + H.264) in Fedora builds.

If there is evidence indicating this is actually the case, please let me know.


https://github.com/DesktopECHO/T95-H616-Malware#25-apr-2023-...

> Thanks to Tanner at LTT for letting me review his findings - It appears the scope of this issue is much bigger than expected; many Android TV Boxes with the AllWinner H616, H618 and RockChip RK3328 feature the "Corejava" C2 Bootstrap.


Apologies.

I dug through LTT's video. They indeed credit you. It seems you may indeed have been the one to get the ball rolling here. Hat's off & well done.


Not this one.

> Nope. While basic Linux support is slowly materializing, two major blockers are still at the same spot - HDMI audio (no useful driver) and bug in display driver (big code change may be required to fix it).

https://forum.libreelec.tv/thread/24275-allwinner-h616-suppo...


I'm with you on that. There are efforts underway to get plain-old Linux running, but it's some time away as this chip only went into mainline as of kernel 6.0


Agh, your script seemed to have bricked my device. It sends it into a loop forever booting and doesn't reach anything. :/

No big loss though, it hasn't been used in years.


Wow sorry to hear that. If you can, check if the device is still available over ADB. If it is, try re-running the script.

Not sure what happened in your case, I flashed many ROMs and ran the script against them to see if anything bad would happen. No issues.

In any case it won't be a Hard Brick. Power off, hold [volume-up] insert power jack and tap the [power] button 10 times. (I think. I lost my remote ages ago and can't check.)


Yep I actually toyed around with it and got it to boot - thanks for the help!


I'm not going to try and change your mind, just sayin' that seems like a really bad idea.


Thanks for this fascinating insight. The jankyness you describe lines-up exactly with what I'm seeing here.

If H616 was the mainstream/volume chip box to have in 2021, then I'm super-interested to see what their 2023 H618 boxes look like. They are all over Amazon with loads of reviews on YouTube, just like its predecessor.

Considering the interest this write-up has generated I'm inclined get one and 'take the bullet' to see if this behaviour is continues. Given your insight about how these chips get sold, chances seem quite high.


Yeah, I must admit that I have a morbid fascination with these devices. I mean they are cheap and hackable after all. And after reading your article I also thought about getting a new one to see what they are up to these days :-D.


These boxes identify themselves as a Google Pixel 2 (walleye) because, reasons!


Which probably means they can upload unlimited photos to Google photos without it counting against the users quota ...


Only the original Pixel gets unlimited.


Title was changed by the mods so that's how it stays! :)


It's the same title of your post on github. The mods did not change anything.


Clearly you never saw the original title before it was changed by the mods, but believe whatever you like.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: