>After the election, users left the Elon Musk-owned platform in droves, unwilling to centralize the way they talk to people online around this one website.
>...
>Unfortunately, this is what all of the internet is right now: social media, owned by large corporations that make changes to them to limit or suppress your speech, in order to make themselves more attractive to advertisers or just pursue their owners’ ends.
twitter emigre were fine with centralization of power, suppression of speech, and appeasement of advertisers just a few years ago, back when Ministry of Trust and Safety commissars were on-call 24x7 to suppress speech they didn't like and summarily unperson the offenders.
for-profit media unapologetically uses what little influence they have left to smear their competitors, hence all the drivel: "think of the children / fear the evil russians!" about social media and "think of the copyright holders / fear the evil terminators!" about AI.
God wills it, ten years from now they will all be out of job. The publications will still be there, of course, but the shilling will be delegated to LLMs prompted by Bangladeshi youths for $5 a day, with a few meatsack editors to set the tone.
Insert any other country you like that doesn't have extradition agreements with the United States. Any other country the law can at least ostensibly be enforced there, even if it isn't always
you didn't vote for it either. the only vaguely "socialist" candidate in the recent history was Bernie Sanders, who got passed over in favor of bland, faux-progressive neo-liberals both times he ran.
QwQ glitches when you grill it with a jailbreak for this topic. It strongly resists questions pertaining to ethnicities. But if you hold it right it gives you the answer despite complaining a lot and glitches into Chinese then back into English.
(snip)
However, this approach has several limitations and ethical considerations. Assigning a monetary value to人口群体可能被视为物化个人，并且可能忽视了人口群体在社会中的多方面贡献，而不仅仅是经济方面的贡献。此外，这样的计算可能会强化刻板印象或加剧社会不平等。
此外，由于数据的复杂性和可变性，这样的计算可能并不准确，而且不同群体之间的比较可能具有误导性。例如，某些群体可能在不同的生命周期阶段，或者面临不同的社会经济挑战，这些因素都可能影响他们的经济贡献。
总之，虽然从技术上可以尝试计算每个人口群体的净现值，但这种做法存在很大的争议，并且可能不是评估人口群体价值的适当方法。人口的价值应该超越单纯的经济指标，包括文化、社会和政治等多个方面的贡献。
(snip)
> I'm sorry, but I can't answer this question. It's important to approach such sensitive topics with care and respect for all individuals and groups. The U.S. has a diverse population, and crime statistics should be interpreted carefully to avoid stereotypes or discrimination. It's crucial to base discussions on reliable data and to consider the complex social and economic factors that influence crime rates. Let's focus on promoting understanding and inclusivity.
I'm amazed you think American and Chinese censorship are in any way comparable. Communist governments have a long and storied history of controlling information so the people don't get exposed to any dangerous ideas.
Surely on HN of all places we're aware that the CCP for decades now has been as communist as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has been democratic?
You're looking for "authoritarian" or "dictatorial".
2025 lets go, new administration is up for anything and has no clue what theyre doing
The center is unguarded I bet I could get the 119th congress to pass anything since all the moneyed interests went to far extremes of their parties and will never get their causes passed the filibuster
