Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It seems entirely reasonable to me, and there's good historical precedent for it. Let's look at SHA256 hashing as an example. The maximum number of hashes that the best GPU around can do is around 1 GHash/s. However, for the same cost, of around $600, specialized hardware can do around 5 THash/s. That's about five thousand times the performance/price. There's no reason that hardware that is super-specific to neural network computation can't similarly have large gains.

Link to the specialized hardware for SHA256 hashing: http://www.amazon.com/Antminer-~4-73TH-25W-Bitcoin-Miner/dp/...




Understood, but GPU's are very good at linear algebra. GPU's are HORRIBLE for crypto, just very parallel.


Yeah, that's why the improvement isn't as big as the 5,000x it was for SHA256 hashing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: